Security Testing and Assurance

Validate security controls through targeted technical assessment. CyberKnox combines testing depth with clear guidance for risk owners, engineers and leadership.

YOUR TRUSTED SECURITY PARTNER

Methodology And Process

CyberKnox designs testing around the assurance question, environment and risk:

Define objectives, scope, evidence and safety controls.
Select testing techniques appropriate to the technology.
Execute controlled assessment and validate material findings.
Translate evidence into remediation and assurance decisions.

Deliverables And Outcomes

The engagement provides clear, usable assurance:

Agreed test plan and coverage.
Evidence-based findings and severity.
Root-cause and remediation guidance.
Executive and technical reporting.
Optional retest and recurring assurance.

Key Benefits

CyberKnox brings multiple testing disciplines together under one accountable assurance approach.

Test the Right Controls

Align assessment depth to the systems, threats and decisions that matter to the organisation.

Act on Clear Findings

Give owners practical remediation priorities supported by technical evidence.

Gain Independent Evidence

Validate whether security design and implementation perform as expected.

Improve Continuously

Use retesting and recurring assurance to track closure and respond to environmental change.

What Assurance Question Must Be Answered?

Organisations need security testing when critical systems are changing, controls have not been independently validated, or leaders require stronger evidence of technical resilience.

The correct method may be penetration testing, vulnerability assessment, application security, architecture review, adversary simulation or a combination.

CyberKnox begins with the decision the evidence must support, then selects an appropriate, proportionate testing approach.

Creating a Repeatable Assurance Program

Point–time testing is most valuinable when findings feed a broader cycle of remediation, validation and governance.

CyberKnox aligns coverage to critical assets, release schedules, technology change and relevant threat scenarios. Results are communicated to both technical owners and accountable leaders, with actions tracked through remediation and retesting.

Recurring assurance can then focus on the environments and control changes with the greatest potential impact.

CyberKnox Essential Eight Services

Penetration Testing

Simulate realistic attacker behaviour across agreed systems, applications and users.

Vulnerability Assessment

Identify and prioritise known weaknesses across the agreed technology estate.

Architecture Review

Evaluate security design, trust boundaries, data flows and control dependencies.

Cloud Security Review

Assess cloud identities, control planes, workloads, data and monitoring configurations.

Application Security

Assess web, mobile, API and software security across design and implementation.

Adversary Simulation

Exercise detection and response against controlled, objective-led threat scenarios.

Configuration Assessment

Review security-relevant configuration against risk and accepted practice.

OT & Infrastructure

Evaluate infrastructure and operational environments with appropriate safety constraints.

Assurance Plan

Testing objectives, systems, evidence, techniques, exclusions and rules of engagement.

Technical Findings

Validated weaknesses with evidence, affected assets, impact and corrective guidance.

Executive Summary

Clear articulation of material exposure, priorities, decisions and residual risk.

Engagement Scope

Final scope, assumptions, responsibilities and timings are agreed before delivery.

Retest Report

Independent confirmation of remediation status and remaining conditions.

Assurance Roadmap

A sequenced plan for future testing based on risk, change and compliance needs.

Our Partners

Get Started

Design a Risk-Led Security Assurance Program with CyberKnox

Engagements are scoped carefully, executed within agreed safety controls and reported in language suited to engineers, risk owners and leadership.

We remove unnecessary volume and focus on validated evidence, credible impact and practical improvement. Final methodology, credentials, testing windows, standards, deliverables and retest requirements are documented in the agreed statement of work.